Female Nude, 1910 – Egon Schiele

By

Pencil drawing, Female Nude, Weiblicher Akt, by Egon Schiele, 1910. ALBERTINA Museum. A seated figure study on brown paper showing a subject with a hand raised to the face, draped in a dark cloak. Kallir d583.

Egon Schiele:
Female Nude (Weiblicher Akt), 1910
Pencil on brown wrapping paper
54.2 × 38 cm
©Albertina, Vienna
(Kallir d583)

Egon Schiele didn’t do passive art. In 1910, he distanced himself from the pretty, decorative style of his mentor Gustav Klimt and started drawing the human body exactly how it felt—raw, uncomfortable, and intense. This drawing in the Albertina Museum is a perfect example of why his work still shocks, but today for a very different reason.

Let’s not bypass the obvious: the model in this drawing was only thirteen or fourteen years old. Viewed through a modern lens, this feels deeply uneasy, even problematic. It forces us to ask why Schiele was so obsessed with models of this age.

Why the Young Models?

Schiele wasn’t looking for classic, idealized studio models. He wanted raw truth. To understand his choice, we have to look at the brutal reality of Vienna around 1900. For the working-class children Schiele drew, there was barely such a thing as ‘adolescence’ or a protected childhood. These kids grew up incredibly fast on the streets, often pushed into adulthood and work at an age we now consider early childhood. This makes their reality often very difficult for us to comprehend today.

For Schiele, these teenagers captured a psychological state that adults had lost: the chaotic, unpolished transition of life. This age group embodied a pure, unfiltered sexuality that hadn’t yet been tamed or hidden by society’s strict, hypocritical rules. He actively sought out these working-class youth because they were uninhibited, possessed an authentic body language, and were willing to play along with his raw artistic experiments.

The Game of Exposure

In this specific sheet, the young model completely controls the space. Using a simple cloth drape, she plays a deliberate, almost theatrical game between hiding and showing, between shame and total shamelessness. She isn’t a passive object waiting to be looked at; she is staring right back, forcing the viewer into a voyeuristic trap.

Eye vs. Body

The drawing thrives on a subtle psychological tension between two focal points:

  • The Eye: The model pulls down her eyelid with her hand—a classic Schiele gesture. It forces a direct, captivating eye contact, making it impossible to ignore her presence as a person.
  • The Body: Positioned directly below that gaze, in the exact center of the lower half, is her vulnerability and nudity.

Your attention is instantly caught in a loop, shifting back and forth between her intense gaze and her naked body. Schiele creates an inescapable connection between the model’s inner awareness and the raw physical reality of her form, a balance made even more complex by her youth.

Too Shocking for the Owner

The sheer intensity of this drawing was too much for past collectors. A previous owner couldn’t handle the explicit nature of the lower half. Their solution? They literally folded the paper in half, wrapped the bottom part around a piece of cardboard, and hid it from view. They broke the connection between the eyes and the body because the truth of the drawing scared them.

It took until a major restoration in 2005 for the Albertina to remove the backing, flatten the crease, and glue the two halves back together. After nearly a century of forced modesty, Schiele’s complicated, raw vision is finally back on display exactly as he intended.

Posted In ,

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Schiele & Klimt: The Art of Secession and Beyond

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading